|
View Poll Results: Should BMW call it an M1? | |||
Yes, call it an M1 | 332 | 66.80% | |
No, absolutely not | 165 | 33.20% | |
Voters: 497. You may not vote on this poll |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
01-13-2010, 09:14 AM | #89 |
Lieutenant Colonel
99
Rep 1,575
Posts |
Couple Facts:
1) This thread is biased as shit. 2) A great number of 1-series owners are 1st time BMW owners due to the price point. And a lot of them are young enough to where they dont give a shit, just vote cus M1 sounds cool! 3) Considering #2, a good portion of 1-Series drivers are noobs to BMW, M, it's tradition and history. Hence some of the absolutely brain dead logic and reasoning here. 4) THIS THREAD DOES NOT BELONG IN THE 1-SERIES FORUM. You want to know if its good to throw the M1 badge on the 1 series??? Ask the M forums, ask new and old M drivers. The guys that buy M cars. Not a 1-series forum where entry level BMW buyers are TRYING to reason and vote about the absolute BEST thing about BMW... The ///M Cars. lol big joke. I really dont think its going to happen. BTW, this is coming from someone who has already decided to purchase the 1-series M variation when it comes out.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 10:06 AM | #90 | |
Lieutenant
58
Rep 503
Posts |
Quote:
1) How is it biased? when the car comes out the 1 series owners are going to be the market for this car, and from what I read, some 3 owners too. If the car is being produced by the M division then it should be named accordingly, " The Ultimate Driving Machine". 2) This is my 3rd BMW and I bought the 1 series over the 3 series because of the "back to basics" size and handling of the car, which I think BMW has strayed from. I believe there are many more out there like me who believe this too. 3) I think we all know of the M division and the BMW history. That's what noobs do, they educate themselves of the brand they are inspired by. I dont care what they call the car as long as the M division did the work on it. 4) I think the reason the M1 is being built is because of all these 1 series owners who bought the car. If the car didn’t sell well there would be no M1 going into production. Who else would be better to pontificate on what would be best for the 1 series than those who have bought into the series and understand their car. Just because someone owns an M does not make them a savant on M cars that havent even come out yet. I'll leave that to the Motorsport Division of BMW. Since the 1 series came out the 1 forums have filled with suggested improvement to enhance the driving experience and now that BMW has decided to commit to building this car, we have a right to share in the discussions and opinions, so I think the question is posted in the right forum.
__________________
MM
Last edited by M2; 01-13-2010 at 10:31 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 10:56 AM | #91 | |||||
Lieutenant Colonel
99
Rep 1,575
Posts |
Quote:
Who cares what they call it? Exactly my point! The people saying call it an M1 obviously dont care how the name is used. Thanks for proving my point. Quote:
I obviously didnt say ALL 1-series drivers, nor did I single anyone out. But the fact remains. I myself had been debating getting a 135 in addition to the M3 because I miss the I6 from my other M3s and the lighter, fun feel of my E36 M3. But that does not mean that is who 135 buyers are in general. With the M variation of the 1series on its way, Im excited and ready to buy it. Quote:
I will buy one no matter what its called. But that dosnt change the fact that M1 is a historic name and one that can be used for THEE supercar when it comes. Quote:
If the 1-series wants to wear an M1 badge, that should be voted by fans of M, not the 1 series. Of course you wanna wear the supercar badge! But thats not cool man... not cool. So you think 1-series owners should vote on what happens with historic M1 badge instead of M fans and owners? Really??? Quote:
With all that said, I DO believe an M worthy 1-series should definitely wear the ///M Badge. Just not M1.
__________________
|
|||||
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 11:00 AM | #92 |
Resident Kerbalnaut
477
Rep 10,703
Posts |
Hey 3XTR3M3, anybody can vote in the poll and this thread is even on the homepage. If you want M owners in on it aswell why not start a thread on the M Forums with a link here.
Or ask the mods to move it. And why are the same people who are talking about the history of the M1 name not up in arms about people wanting to call it the M Coupe when that is obviously reserved for Zeds? I just dont understand most of the arguments here. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 11:01 AM | #93 |
Captain
17
Rep 619
Posts |
That's what I was thinking but that too is ambiguous with a past model so how is that really any better.
So as not to offend anyone about a car they sold a grand total of 456 of, call it either: M1 coupe or just plain M.
__________________
2015 Valencia Msport X1 sdrive28i
2014 Mazda CX-5 AWD gt Was: 2009 Montego/terra 128i 6MT (ouch)...great car Last edited by Monterra; 01-13-2010 at 11:19 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 11:09 AM | #94 | |
Moderator
559
Rep 4,240
Posts |
Quote:
2.) A great number of 3 series buyers were first time BMW buyers due to its price point prior to March 2008(1er launch date). I don't see the point here. One can argue that there are more "young" 3 drivers than there are 1 since the 1 is outsold 8 to 1. I've been on this site for quite sometime and the majority of 1addicts ARE NOT noobs. 3.) I'm not even responding to this one. See #2 ^. 4.) This thread ABSOLUTELY belongs in the 1 series forum. I know this because there is a dedicated M1 Forum link at the top of the page.
__________________
- 04 Honda S2000(gone)
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 11:18 AM | #95 | |
Colonel
653
Rep 2,703
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 11:24 AM | #96 |
Colonel
702
Rep 2,548
Posts
Drives: '08 135i, '88 325is
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Denver, CO
|
Many car enthusiasts and BMW fans know that the original M1 existed.
__________________
Delivered in Munich, broken in on the Nurburgring.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 11:27 AM | #97 | |
Moderator
559
Rep 4,240
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
- 04 Honda S2000(gone)
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 12:12 PM | #98 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
99
Rep 1,575
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Guys, guys, Im not saying 1-series owners dont get a vote or your opinion dosnt matter. Not at all. I am saying however, that this is absolutely biased. And I'm sure you guys see where I'm coming from. I strongly believe if this was posted on an M forum that the results would be much different. the thread is titled, "The Definitive BMW M1 naming poll" and it's on the 1-series forum which (duh)makes sense cus its in regards to the 1-series. If your goal was to get specific 1-series owners opinions on using the M1 name, you got it. You hit your goal, you got the results. BUT... thats majority of what 1-series owners think the 1-series M should be called. This is the voice of 1 owners, not M owners. Pretty biased. No??
__________________
Last edited by 3XTR3M3; 01-13-2010 at 12:29 PM.. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 12:35 PM | #99 | |
Private First Class
2
Rep 115
Posts |
Quote:
I will happily buy an M1. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 12:44 PM | #100 | |
Major
52
Rep 1,118
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
-----LS3 C6----- z51 suspension, NPP dual mode exhaust(wild2mild),20% tint, zr1 replica wheels, gloss black fender stripes R.I.P SGM 135i w/ some mods |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 12:54 PM | #101 |
Lieutenant Colonel
99
Rep 1,575
Posts |
QUESTION:
How many of you would find it OK if 10 years from now, Ferrari released a cheaper, lower end model like the Ferrari California or below it and decided to call it the Ferrari Enzo? One might argue that 10 years is too short. Than whats acceptable? 20 years? 50 years? If 50 years later the lowest end Ferrari was called the Enzo, would you car enthusiasts find it acceptable and see no problem with it??? Come on You cant take the 1st M cars, the BMW supercars name and slap it on a 1-series. I dont understand how this is remotely ok with car enthusiasts.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 01:06 PM | #102 |
Lieutenant General
1138
Rep 12,444
Posts |
I know what you're trying to say.^
I'm sure the people who voted yes are 1 series owners.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 01:29 PM | #103 | |
Major
52
Rep 1,118
Posts |
Quote:
Why didn't people originally freak out when the M cars in general started being mass produced well after the original M1 was made???.. and especially giving those mass produced models numbers > 1.... to me if that was allowed than go ahead and make another M1.. who cares? The fact BMW decided to start with the naming convention M"insert number here" after knowing what they had in the original M1 is how they shot themselves in the foot from the start... To me a naming convention should be consistent.. so since it has already been screwed up years ago then why bother trying to fix it now..
__________________
-----LS3 C6----- z51 suspension, NPP dual mode exhaust(wild2mild),20% tint, zr1 replica wheels, gloss black fender stripes R.I.P SGM 135i w/ some mods |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 01:35 PM | #104 | |
Resident Kerbalnaut
477
Rep 10,703
Posts |
Quote:
The Enzo is only considered a highend car because it performs well. Ferrari couldve called the 430 Scuderia the 430 Enzo and people wouldve been ok with it, because both cars are in the same performance bracket. This is why im ok with it being called an M1, because it will be a kickass little monster, just as the M1 is. And since we are on the subject of Ferraris, people were cool with the Ferrari California being called California, even after that name took a hike for quite some time. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 01:41 PM | #105 | |
First Lieutenant
51
Rep 305
Posts |
Quote:
Exactly!! Extreme, you're beating a dead horse. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 01:48 PM | #106 | |
Lieutenant
58
Rep 503
Posts |
Quote:
I am a M fan and a 1 series owner, so I believe I fit your criteria for deciding what the car is called. If it is called the ///M1 then that's what BMW Motorsport decides, not me. It's their heritage and their history that they decide. So by saying that this forum is biased, you are saying that posting the question on the M site would be equally biased. The question was posted here because the thread creator wanted to know what we thought. So biased or not, the voting is not just limited to 1 series owners since the post link is on the main Bimmerpost page therefore everyone can vote; that is if you feel like slumming in the 1 series forum.
__________________
MM
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 01:49 PM | #107 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
99
Rep 1,575
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
But you are not calling it a 430 Enzo... you are calling it the EXACT same name as the 1st M and supercar. this is not a variation of M1, its the exact same name!!! How do enthusiasts see this as ok?? BMW im sure was not thinking that far ahead that there would 1 day be a 1 series and they would have this dilema. But either way, you cant take the name of a supercar, the 1st M ever, the birth of M... and giive it to the 1-series. Whatever, its not gonna happen. We'll revisit this thread when the car is released and laugh about it. Either at me or with me haha
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 01:54 PM | #109 |
Resident Kerbalnaut
477
Rep 10,703
Posts |
And they call the 1 series owners biased...
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 02:00 PM | #110 | |
Lieutenant
58
Rep 503
Posts |
Quote:
...there's a market for the 1 series M.
__________________
MM
Last edited by M2; 01-13-2010 at 03:35 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|