E90Post
 


Coby Wheel
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > BMW E90/E92/E93 3-series General Forums > General E90 Sedan / E91 Wagon / E92 Coupe / E93 Cabrio > 325xi...a dog.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      01-30-2006, 10:41 AM   #89
Yangster
Private
Yangster's Avatar
1
Rep
59
Posts

Drives: E90 325xi
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

Well, I love my "dog." And, what the Hell, it's the year of the dog anyway!
__________________

325xi
Steptronic / Arctic Metallic / Black Leather / Aluminum Trim
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2006, 11:49 AM   #90
beldredge
Enlisted Member
6
Rep
46
Posts

Drives: '11 335 xdrive m-sport
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by StewtheBassman
Legacy turbos SUCK gas, if driven the way they are meant to be driven.
Legacy turbos are fast, but jerky..that's a 2.5 litre 4 cylinder engine doing all that work.
The Legacy is mostly a fixed AWD with a LSD (which works nicely), but it's not xDrive.
The Legacy engine is loud.
The Legacy ACC is poor, I'm not making that up.
THere is no telescoping wheel in the Legacy.


Need I go on? For a couple thousand more the Bimmer is a much better car.
5.1 seconds is fun, but if that's what you NEED in a family sedan then maybe there are other anatomical issues which need tending to.....
My comment on considering the Legacy was tongue-in-cheek. Just that the 5.1 sec stat is pretty impressive, regardless of how they got it. I had an older Legacy, and have thoroughly researched and test-driven the current turbo models, and agree with most everything you said.
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2006, 12:23 PM   #91
StewtheBassman
Major General
Canada
199
Rep
6,381
Posts

Drives: 2011 X5d 421,000kms
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hudson, Quebec

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by beldredge
My comment on considering the Legacy was tongue-in-cheek. Just that the 5.1 sec stat is pretty impressive, regardless of how they got it. I had an older Legacy, and have thoroughly researched and test-driven the current turbo models, and agree with most everything you said.



I had one for three months over the summer and ditched it 'cause of the seat.



I would still love to see how it would have handled our miserable 'effin winter....that turbo in winter's cold would have been SICKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________

Appreciate 0
      01-30-2006, 12:40 PM   #92
lux.sh
missing two turbos.
lux.sh's Avatar
United_States
577
Rep
4,859
Posts

Drives: fast around corners.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Curves

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by acd483
My family's been back and forth over the 325xi touring and the Audi A4 2.0TQ Avant.

I had reservations about the A4, having driven the 1.8T Quattro and found it sluggish. I ended up driving an S-Line 2.0T sedan. It handled beautifully, looked great and had decent get-up-and-go. Bottom line? Very surprising and pretty impressive.

On the other hand, I was very eager to test the xi because I feel the 330i to be dreamy and the 325i more than adequate. Well, an already fat car put on ~500lbs with the electronic awd and felt like the 1.8T Audi. I was dismayed; with no available sport suspension it had little of the spirit that makes BMWs fun to drive.

Sorry boys, but the Audi wins this time. If only BMW made a RWD Touring or a 330xiT...

Has anyone else found the 325xi unbearable? Because I see a lot driving around and can't figure it out.
So uh.. Lets see. You liked the Audi more. And you find 325xi to be "unbearable". What is that you need us to inform you about?
You've driven the car. You didn't like it. Story ends.
BMW is not a perfect car, and is not going to satisfy everyone. There is one simple answer though, why don't you just get a 330xi then?
Excuse my communication level, I didn't quite get that "dreamy" comment.
__________________
06 AW E90 330i ZPP/ZSP/Step/Expired Warranty

: Prior Design Front : ACS Rear : ACS Roof : BlackLines : Simota Intake : Carbon Fiber Interior Trim :
: MTEC V3 : 24% Charcoal : V1 Hardwired : Solaris Invisibulbs/LED interior :
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2006, 04:09 PM   #93
DerekS
Major
DerekS's Avatar
197
Rep
1,180
Posts

Drives: '24 X3 M Sport
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: YVR

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by beldredge
I haven't seen this R&T article in its entirety yet, but I'm not sure I understand why ACD feels "vindicated"? I just saw an excerpt from the results, and saw that R&T got a 0-60 time in the 325xi of 6.5 seconds.

Granted, that's not the fastest of the bunch they tested, but I personally wouldn't consider anything under 7.0 secs a dog. But, it's all personal preference. I'm not thinking of running out and buying a Legacy just for its raw acceleration (then again - 5.1 secs? that's pretty darn fast).
How interesting that R and T confirms the 325 Xi is no dog with a 6.5 sec. time for 0-60. The 325XiT would be 1/10 or 2/10's slower with the additional weight for the wagon. In comparison, a recent test done by Edmunds.com on the Audi Avant A4/3.2 yielded a 0-60 time of 7.9; this was slower than Audi's claim. Similar results have been found in other tests of Audis by Car and Driver, etc. Bimmer fans know that BMW's acceleration claims are always understated. Nice to know that the 325XiT will blow off any A4 wagon with either the 2.0T or the 3.2 V6.
Then there is the 50/50 weight distribution that BMW offers compared to Audi's 58.5/41.5 ratio for the A4 wagon. It's little wonder that the BMW's handling dynamics are superior to Audis.
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST