BMW 1 Series Coupe Forum / 1 Series Convertible Forum (1M / tii / 135i / 128i / Coupe / Cabrio / Hatchback) (BMW E82 E88 128i 130i 135i)
 





 

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-10-2007, 12:24 PM   #89
321
Stay a while and listen...
21
Rep
375
Posts

Drives: vr4
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: slo, ca

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett View Post
Sorry, but the 335i folk have already reached that limit
I haven't seen a n54 that has maxed out the BPU's and used race gas.. (apparently the guy who cut that ridiculous 60' had a race gas map but that is speculation)

There is a handful of people that are doing turbo swaps
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2007, 01:10 PM   #90
321
Stay a while and listen...
21
Rep
375
Posts

Drives: vr4
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: slo, ca

iTrader: (0)

I know that turbocharging is possible because of the high velocity pulse gases(something ridiculous like 1000ft/sec) I just don't know how much of that energy is eaten by the turbine. I would think it would depend a lot on a/r and the design of the exhaust system.(ie: minimal reversion) The 335i manifolds aren't exactly log style but they definitely are not mandrel so reversion is going to play a role at all rpm's.

Time to search! I love this shit.:drinking:
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2007, 01:19 PM   #91
321
Stay a while and listen...
21
Rep
375
Posts

Drives: vr4
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: slo, ca

iTrader: (0)

sorry OP for mucking it up(a lot)

http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showt...4180#post24180

/hijack
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2007, 04:31 PM   #92
240M3SRT
***** badass
240M3SRT's Avatar
1
Rep
21
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Aug 2007

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TESLAASTRO View Post
245s in the rear are pretty beefy....
My buddies 750 hp viper has 335's, thats beefy.

300tq will smoke 245's from a dig, any power upgrades will just make it worse.
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2007, 06:58 PM   #93
BForbes
Moderator
BForbes's Avatar
Bahamas
557
Rep
4,240
Posts

Drives: BSM 135i/AW E90 M3
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Orlando, FL

iTrader: (0)

My official 0-60 opinion is now 4.7 seconds.
__________________
- 04 Honda S2000(gone)
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2007, 09:34 PM   #94
kurichan
Mr. Happy
8
Rep
479
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Aug 2007

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett View Post
Sorry, but the 335i folk have already reached that limit
What limit Garrett?

Do you have any reliable direct information? It seems your information source is from the e90 site... Not the pinnacle of factual sources.

Do you know for certain that the exhaust is the problem?

Do you understand that you don't need dual pipes to get flow?

Dual or single has very little to do with the challenge here.

You're chasing a red herring.
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2007, 08:24 AM   #95
Garrett
Banned
23
Rep
1,356
Posts

Drives: 2004 330ci
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mich

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurichan View Post
What limit Garrett?

Do you have any reliable direct information? It seems your information source is from the e90 site... Not the pinnacle of factual sources.

Do you know for certain that the exhaust is the problem?

Do you understand that you don't need dual pipes to get flow?

Dual or single has very little to do with the challenge here.

You're chasing a red herring.

Yeah the fact the DP's are already yielding pretty good number indicated that the 335i stock exhaust is pretty limiting in it's own right.

At 400hp, the exhaust is already retrictive enough to cause a noticible result. If that the case, then at what limit will the 135's more restrictive exhaust, start hampering power gains..?


Dual pipes in not the arguement, but.... since the 335i has dual pipes it has more undisturbed CFM. The overall fluid dynamics are better aswell, so even though it's not that much of a hinderance now... my original question remains.

At what point will the 135i more restrictive exhaust become a noticeble bottleneck..?

I'd think somewhere around 390hp. So, some of us that are looking at a more liberal PROcede mapping, might run into having to replace the exhaust aswell.

:iono:



-Garrett
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2007, 09:56 AM   #96
djminkin
Private First Class
15
Rep
195
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Oct 2007

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett View Post
Sorry, but the 335i folk have already reached that limit, I am just wondering how much sooner the 135i will encounter it inefficiencies due to the 135i reduced exhaust sytem.
Yes, I believe the exhaust will offset the weight differences between the two, and probably make them about the same. Im looking towards the tunes and performance upgrades that will make this car insanely fast.
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2007, 12:15 PM   #97
321
Stay a while and listen...
21
Rep
375
Posts

Drives: vr4
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: slo, ca

iTrader: (0)











Some custom gearing where first gear ends in 60mph will lower the time.............................................. ........
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2007, 12:54 PM   #98
kurichan
Mr. Happy
8
Rep
479
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Aug 2007

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett View Post
Dual pipes in not the arguement
You specifically said it was, but at last, now we are getting somewhere...

Quote:
At what point will the 135i more restrictive exhaust become a noticeble bottleneck..?
First, we don't KNOW that the 135i has a more restrictive exhaust. We only know that it's not a dual. A correctly designed single can flow just as much as a dual.

So conjecture on this issue is really sort of moot until the car is actually released and people with real tuning experience get their hands on it.

Quote:
I'd think somewhere around 390hp. So, some of us that are looking at a more liberal PROcede mapping, might run into having to replace the exhaust as well.
How could you possibly even venture a guess on this?

We know literally NOTHING about the exhaust system. It's a shot in the dark...
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2007, 01:01 PM   #99
kurichan
Mr. Happy
8
Rep
479
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Aug 2007

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by zba857 View Post
Some custom gearing where first gear ends in 60mph will lower the time.............................................. ........
A lower final drive will give you quicker times to 60, but it can really screw up your balance. I had a 4.12 on my weekend car which I switched to a 3.88. The car was insanely buzzy with the lower ratio. With the higher ratio, it's much more a pleasure to drive every day, but I have to keep the revvs so much higher to maintain torque when doing performance driving. Anyhow, my point is, don't go changing gear ratios blindly... Make sure you get REALLY good advice when you do something like this. It can change the fundamental nature of the car!
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2007, 04:25 PM   #100
321
Stay a while and listen...
21
Rep
375
Posts

Drives: vr4
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: slo, ca

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurichan View Post
A lower final drive will give you quicker times to 60, but it can really screw up your balance. I had a 4.12 on my weekend car which I switched to a 3.88. The car was insanely buzzy with the lower ratio. With the higher ratio, it's much more a pleasure to drive every day, but I have to keep the revvs so much higher to maintain torque when doing performance driving. Anyhow, my point is, don't go changing gear ratios blindly... Make sure you get REALLY good advice when you do something like this. It can change the fundamental nature of the car!
Yea I agree completely.. just trying to sew a torn thread back together...
Appreciate 0
      10-12-2007, 12:18 AM   #101
kurichan
Mr. Happy
8
Rep
479
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Aug 2007

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by zba857 View Post
Yea I agree completely.. just trying to sew a torn thread back together...
Yeah - I was trying to help, but got carried away.

Imagine that... ME getting carried away in a post? :biggrin:
Appreciate 0
      10-12-2007, 07:26 AM   #102
Garrett
Banned
23
Rep
1,356
Posts

Drives: 2004 330ci
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mich

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurichan View Post
You specifically said it was, but at last, now we are getting somewhere...

First, we don't KNOW that the 135i has a more restrictive exhaust. We only know that it's not a dual. A correctly designed single can flow just as much as a dual.

So conjecture on this issue is really sort of moot until the car is actually released and people with real tuning experience get their hands on it.

How could you possibly even venture a guess on this?

We know literally NOTHING about the exhaust system. It's a shot in the dark...

Hrmm..

We do know.... due to the laws of physics and fluid dynamics.

Thats why I said we aren't specifically talking about dual exhaust, but that math behind it. Because two, 2.5" tubes has more flow than a single 3". We know the 135i doesn't go beyond a 3" exhaust from header back. Unless the stock 335i exhaust has some obcenly horrible flaw, we can safely assume that the laws of Physics are correct.

CFM and FD.






-Garrett
Appreciate 0
      10-12-2007, 10:38 AM   #103
BMWeber
Major
36
Rep
1,329
Posts

Drives: 08 135i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Amesbury, MA

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett View Post
Hrmm..

We do know.... due to the laws of physics and fluid dynamics.

Thats why I said we aren't specifically talking about dual exhaust, but that math behind it. Because two, 2.5" tubes has more flow than a single 3". We know the 135i doesn't go beyond a 3" exhaust from header back. Unless the stock 335i exhaust has some obcenly horrible flaw, we can safely assume that the laws of Physics are correct.

CFM and FD.

-Garrett
you don't know. it all depends on the bends of the exhaust and the rectrictions of the muffler/resonators.

the standard formula is 2.2 CFM per hp= no loss from back pressure. straight pipe flows 115 cfm per square inch. 3" straight pipe is good enough for approximately 490 hp. now two 2.5" straight is good for like 820hp. but then you need to take length and number of bends into account on top of the muffler/resonator restriction. Also the duel exhaust is longer and has more bends. there is no way we could know unless we flow tested the two exhausts. but if you could have a 3" exhaust with minimal bends and a shorter length it could easily flow as well as a dual 2.5". do we know the 135i exhaust isn't bigger than 3"?
Appreciate 0
      10-12-2007, 01:51 PM   #104
kurichan
Mr. Happy
8
Rep
479
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Aug 2007

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWeber View Post
you don't know.
Exactly.

At this point, conjecture about this is just masturbation.

It might feel good, but nothing productive will result.
Appreciate 0
      10-12-2007, 06:13 PM   #105
Garrett
Banned
23
Rep
1,356
Posts

Drives: 2004 330ci
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mich

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWeber View Post
you don't know. it all depends on the bends of the exhaust and the rectrictions of the muffler/resonators.

the standard formula is 2.2 CFM per hp= no loss from back pressure. straight pipe flows 115 cfm per square inch. 3" straight pipe is good enough for approximately 490 hp. now two 2.5" straight is good for like 820hp. but then you need to take length and number of bends into account on top of the muffler/resonator restriction. Also the duel exhaust is longer and has more bends. there is no way we could know unless we flow tested the two exhausts. but if you could have a 3" exhaust with minimal bends and a shorter length it could easily flow as well as a dual 2.5". do we know the 135i exhaust isn't bigger than 3"?

From the photos the 135i, the exhaust doesn't look like the pipes get BIGGER from the headers back. So it's safe to assume that the 135i is the same size dia. Though, thats not stopping BMW from suprizing us.

BTW, the CFM you state is in perfect laminar flow. one 45degree bend will reduce those figures considerably.

A simple observation will sugest the 335i's exhaust will have less turbulance, thus a less restrictive ahaust.





-Garrett
Appreciate 0
      10-13-2007, 05:25 AM   #106
321
Stay a while and listen...
21
Rep
375
Posts

Drives: vr4
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: slo, ca

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett View Post
From the photos the 135i, the exhaust doesn't look like the pipes get BIGGER from the headers back
Your kidding me right?? If you meant the downpipes then look at the pictures again.. The headers are connected to the turbine. If you are compelled to further this exhaust discussion don't you think you should start a thread about it?
Appreciate 0
      10-13-2007, 06:27 AM   #107
BMWeber
Major
36
Rep
1,329
Posts

Drives: 08 135i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Amesbury, MA

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett View Post

BTW, the CFM you state is in perfect laminar flow. one 45degree bend will reduce those figures considerably.

A simple observation will sugest the 335i's exhaust will have less turbulance, thus a less restrictive ahaust.

ummmm did you read my post or are you just commenting on the first line. the main point I made is that it all depends on the bends in the pipes and the restriction of the mufflers and resonators. and simple observation? we have not seen a full picture of the 135i exhaust. all we have to go one is some partial pictures taken while the car is on the ground.
Appreciate 0
      10-13-2007, 11:25 AM   #108
BForbes
Moderator
BForbes's Avatar
Bahamas
557
Rep
4,240
Posts

Drives: BSM 135i/AW E90 M3
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Orlando, FL

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by zba857 View Post
Your kidding me right?? If you meant the downpipes then look at the pictures again.. The headers are connected to the turbine. If you are compelled to further this exhaust discussion don't you think you should start a thread about it?
__________________
- 04 Honda S2000(gone)
Appreciate 0
      10-13-2007, 02:11 PM   #109
Garrett
Banned
23
Rep
1,356
Posts

Drives: 2004 330ci
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mich

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWeber View Post
ummmm did you read my post or are you just commenting on the first line. the main point I made is that it all depends on the bends in the pipes and the restriction of the mufflers and resonators. and simple observation? we have not seen a full picture of the 135i exhaust. all we have to go one is some partial pictures taken while the car is on the ground.

Logic dictates that the 135i will not have a radical departure in exhaust design from the 335i. The pipes come off the same engine and travel in the same direction almost the same legnth, the only difference is that one is a true dual exhaust.

That alone DOES have it's benifits..!

We know threw physics and fluid dynamics that any time 2 gases meet there is turbulence and back pressure due to this turbulence. How much and what ineffeciencies that set-up has on the 135i is of interest to me.

Strickly from a tuners, aftermarket point of view.... thus it might limit the 135i's ability to garner better performance number while using Dinan or PROcede software.

CFM in the 335i is better. How much or if it's significant is what I am waiting to find out.

Because it will effect the 0~60 times and the performance of a moded 135i.





-Garrett
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2007, 02:24 AM   #110
321
Stay a while and listen...
21
Rep
375
Posts

Drives: vr4
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: slo, ca

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett View Post
We know threw physics and fluid dynamics that any time 2 gases meet there is turbulence and back pressure due to this turbulence. How much and what ineffeciencies that set-up has on the 135i is of interest to me.

http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1655

read post #7
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM.




1addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST