|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Procede v5 Aggressive maps (FBO+Meth)... 434whp / 478lb-ft
|
|
09-27-2011, 05:53 PM | #1 |
1737
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Procede v5 Aggressive maps (FBO+Meth)... 434whp / 478lb-ft
This is a follow up report from yesterday post.
Test car: 2008 335 FBO (helix IC, catless downpipes, dci, HF secondary cats, HM/Vishnu exhaust) and PWM Meth Procede Rev2.5 6AT at 50k miles No factory oil cooler (!) 91oct This car made 385whp/455lbft on a Mustang Dyno yesterday running 91+Meth. Today, we retested on a Dynojet with the same calibration. Similar conditions (80F). First 3 runs The first run, you can throw out because the cold tires actually slipped on the rollers due to the sudden rise in torque. After they got some heat, they gripped and we saw a consistent 425-430whp and 450-455lb-ft. Interestingly enough, peak torque was identical to what we saw on the Mustang Dyno. But HP numbers were approx 11% higher which is in-line with what were were expecting. So there you have it. Next, we made a few small changes to the test map. Namely a bit more boost/timing in the low end and a small change to the wastegate DC table. And we picked up some extra power/torque. As much as 25lb-ft in low end. With some small mapping changes: So then we did some runs using the currently available 7-29 maps run at the 16.5psi/0%IC and 17.5/0%IC. Since these new Aggressive maps have more boost down low and more ignition advance up high, we expected to see good gains. And we did. New FBO Aggressive map vs. 7-29 maps running suggested boost/IC% settings of 16.5pi/0%IC and 17.5psi/0%IC: Compared to the suggested PWM Meth settings of 16.5psi/0%IC, these new Aggressive FBO maps made as much as 40-45lb-ft of torque and 20-25whp up top. Pretty big gains across the board. And they generated some great datalogs to go with it. Solid timing, fat boost curve and very low IATs. Aggressive FBO 93+Meth logs: Next, we added some 98oct (from the a local gas station that sells high test fuels) to create a nicely controlled 93-94oct blend. As expected, power didn't increase over the 91+meth results since we are already running the ignition timing targets we specified. Perhaps we could go more aggressive but I think we are good for the time being until we get some customer feedback/logs. Next, we spent most of the afternoon calibrating the 94oct map (no meth). This map runs much less timing advance and doesn't have nearly as an aggressive boost curve. But boost still peaks at 16-17psi down low. By peak hp, it's dropped down to 15psi due to IAT/octane constraints. Still made a repeatable 390-400whp/430-440lb-ft despite the back to back dyno marathon. I suspect a nice run on a cooler engine (and in cleaner air) would make a bit over 405whp. 93-94oct (no meth) Aggressive FBO map runs: Pump gas logs still looked nice. Not overly retarded with excessive boost Pump gas logs: Compared to the 7-29 maps running typical 93-94oct settings (16psi/50%IC), the Aggressive FBO maps made up to 30lb-ft more torque in the low-end/midrange. Pump gas FBO Aggressive vs 7/29 maps running 16psi/50%IC: On the road, when running the 93-94oct FBO Aggressive map, the extra low end/midrange pump is easily felt. Car lunges forward when asked. And feels noticeably quicker. Strangely enough, it even feels stronger up top even though the dyno (and reality) suggest otherwise. But since you are not always driving above 5500rpm, the extra torque in the low/midrange makes the car ultimately quicker. No doubt. Especially after you grab the next gea and fall into the meat of the power-band. But the real eye-opener is just how aggressive we were able to safely get when running PWM meth. 435whp is no joke on stock turbos on a 6AT that still has secondary HF cats. With a 6MT and running fully catless, I suspect we could have seen 440-445whp which is exactly what I saw running max-power custom-tuned mapping that I ran on my 6MT when it ran ran 11.50s on stock turbos last year (FBO with m10 meth nozzle running peak of 20+psi peak). But the difference is that now the boost is considerably lower considerably lower up top. And when using PWM meth, effective octane/IAT is stable/consistent enough for this to be a publicly available map. Even more apparent is just how "happy" the engine is when running meth. You can see it on the dyno and you can feel/hear it on the road. That's a function of the much lower combustion temps and higher octane. I don't know how many people have felt 470-480lbft of torque plateau (not a spike) before. But it's pretty eye-opening! I'll see if i can get video of this thing on the road. I suspect the owner (SIHK335) will have some fun with it Tomorrow, I'll be going to the dyno to dial in some non FBO aggressive maps using Hellblazer420's 6MT (DCI and PWM Meth only). So by the end of the week, I should have a nice assortment of maps (FBO and nonFBO) to give out to those who have access to good gas and/or meth. After that, I'll see what more we can squeeze out of our miserable 91oct Cheers Shiv Last edited by OpenFlash; 09-28-2011 at 10:40 PM.. |
09-27-2011, 06:02 PM | #2 |
Some say...
239
Rep 4,296
Posts
Drives: Fresh
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Baton Rouge n NOLA
|
OMG I cannot wait for meth. Being that this is on stock turbos, how reliable do you think it will be? Or is it even really any harder them at all?
__________________
I have exhaust and an intake... |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 06:07 PM | #3 |
1737
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Low end/midrange boost is more aggressive for sure. But up top, boost still tapers to 13-15psi by 6500rpm and just 10psi by 7000rpm. Certainly a lot less stressful to your turbos than trying to run max boost all the way to redline. On an FBO car, this boost profile really should be unreasonably hard on the turbos. In this case, instead of trying to make all the power through running more boost, we left boost reasonable up top and just ran more ignition timing courtesy of Methanol. That alone gave us over 15whp while dropping EGTs and improving engine efficiency. Truly a vice-less change given all the cooling/octane we have on hand.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 06:09 PM | #4 | |
Some say...
239
Rep 4,296
Posts
Drives: Fresh
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Baton Rouge n NOLA
|
Quote:
__________________
I have exhaust and an intake... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 06:38 PM | #5 |
First Lieutenant
5
Rep 300
Posts |
Sign me up for the Hellblazer maps when you have them. He and I are running virtually the same configuration. I will be very interested in the delta.
__________________
DD: 2007 BMW 335i Sedan
Weekends: 2004 Porsche 911 C4S |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 06:38 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant
35
Rep 553
Posts |
OMG
Could you please do something like this on the N55. PLEASE lol
__________________
USED TO HAVE A 385 whp 479 tq N55 335 2011 (AT) AND NOW A 135 M package 2010 (AT) 447whp/504tq
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 06:55 PM | #8 |
Formerly (-(ellblazer420
48
Rep 703
Posts
Drives: 07 E90 335i M/T, 15 F80 M3 DCT
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SF East Bay, CA
|
Great results!! Reading this got me super excited. I can't wait to get her back and head to Mexico for some of those wings you like Shiv lol. I'm curious to see what she will do without being FBO.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 07:05 PM | #9 |
Colonel
247
Rep 2,567
Posts |
wow, can't wait to update to these maps!!!
Will I get similar results as the non meth dyno? I have the following.. Vanguard Exhaust AR Catless dp's ETS 5" FMIC Stett CAI Stett Chargepipe PROcede V5 Rev 2B
__________________
07 e92 335i - Retired
18 F80 M3CS - Retired 21 G20 330i M-Sport - Current |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 07:37 PM | #10 | |
1737
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Quote:
Shiv |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 07:39 PM | #11 | |
Colonel
184
Rep 2,841
Posts |
Quote:
I was running the first version of this map yesterday with none of the tweaking Shiv did today. Stock exhaust system...just DCI and Intercooler....so still a pretty good bottleneck to flow. When the boost surge peaked around 4K rpm I began to have to correct the steering because the back end was getting a little loose on me. That was in 3rd gear with the car already rolling at WOT from 2K It can only be called T H R U S T |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 07:41 PM | #12 | |
Colonel
247
Rep 2,567
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
07 e92 335i - Retired
18 F80 M3CS - Retired 21 G20 330i M-Sport - Current |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 07:47 PM | #13 |
1737
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Yes, this map is an Aggressive FBO map. Map1 is pump gas settings. Map2 is Meth map settings. With the Procede controlling the transition between the two maps settings based on monitored meth flow. If you don't have meth flow, you won't run the meth map settings
Shiv |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 08:05 PM | #14 |
Colonel
247
Rep 2,567
Posts |
Makes sense. So I'd be ok running these maps on the V5 Rev 2B? I don't have meth yet. In a nutshell, I just want to be able to extract a bit more power with the boltons I have. I spoke to you a while ago, and you mentioned the settings on the procede are too conservative, just want to make it a bit more aggressive. =)
__________________
07 e92 335i - Retired
18 F80 M3CS - Retired 21 G20 330i M-Sport - Current |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 08:20 PM | #15 | |
Formerly (-(ellblazer420
48
Rep 703
Posts
Drives: 07 E90 335i M/T, 15 F80 M3 DCT
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SF East Bay, CA
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 08:23 PM | #16 |
Second Lieutenant
14
Rep 284
Posts |
Can't wait to test these out. My car already feels fast. More low end torque
__________________
PROCEDE V5, AR CATLESS DP's, HELIX FMIC, ER CHARGE PIPE AND TIAL BOV, OHLINS ROAD AND TRACK COILOVERS, INJEN INTAKE, AWD TURBO UPGRADE, VISHNU PWM METHANOL INJECTION, AMS CATBACK EXHAUST, M3 FRONT SUSPENSION COMPONENTS,VOLK RE30 19X9F 19X10R W/ YOKOHAMA ADVAN AD08 265/275
Last edited by Overboost; 09-27-2011 at 08:37 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 09:39 PM | #17 |
Banned
29
Rep 968
Posts
Drives: 2007 335i Coupe
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
|
Gents
THRUST is being modest, this car is completely insane. After you feel the initial burst of torque real low in the RPM range the car just keeps on pulling and feels like the torque is pushing the car faster and faster it's all still there and you are just flying. You have to feel this to understand what this car feels like. It will break loose of traction in 1st 2nd 3rd, when ever you ask it. Full review later after I drive this beast some more. Why wait for other developers to get it wrong when it's all the safe power you want. Beware newbies there will be Haters in the air who think the sky is red and the earth is flat, I welcome the haters to come take a drive my door is open. Cause they won't believe the data |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 09:52 PM | #18 | |
Colonel
184
Rep 2,841
Posts |
Quote:
When did that happen |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 10:04 PM | #20 |
Major
158
Rep 1,288
Posts
Drives: 2014 435iX, FBO
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
I have Rev 2... you don't need any more than that to try these maps out do you? Guys like me in the stone ages (April 2011) can try it?
__________________
2020 M2 Competition HS, DCT, 763s, Carbon: splitter, side skirt, grill, diffuser, wing
Previous: 2014 BMW F32 435iX - JB4, MHD Flash, BMS Meth Kit, ER Intercooler, intake, catless DPs, KW Streets, 437M Reps with 245/35 and 275/30 Michelin PSS 4S |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2011, 10:43 PM | #22 |
1737
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Yesterday, when on the mustang dyno, i spent the whole time calibrating the meth map. Unfortunately, I didn't do any pump gas tuning/testing due to time constraints. It was only until today, on the Dynojet, that I spent most of my time with the pump gas (93/94oct) calibration. 400whp/440lbft without meth and 435whp/478lbft with meth. Dyno graphs in first post
Last edited by OpenFlash; 09-27-2011 at 11:16 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|