07-02-2016, 02:02 PM | #45 |
First Lieutenant
70
Rep 359
Posts |
Hi guys! Some updates on the car.. I did some changes to map 6 via jb4 and running on RON98 PUMP gas (similar to 93 in US) with meth, Boosting @ 26-27psi, here's an update on the 100-200km/h performance
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-05-2016, 11:49 PM | #46 |
Supreme Allied Commander
4022
Rep 55,451
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, AP, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, www.hpautosport.com
|
There is hardly any difference between the brands. When compared to the stock DP, the catless version will yield a ~12 hp gain. Perhaps the results will be different with bigger turbos.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-08-2016, 01:18 AM | #47 | |
First Lieutenant
70
Rep 359
Posts |
Quote:
Nice to know |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-11-2016, 06:52 AM | #50 | |
First Lieutenant
70
Rep 359
Posts |
Quote:
First off, everyone said that it felt exactly like stock after the first 30 secs of normal driving , so I would say that the Pure Turbos did a great job and managed to retain the "stock" feel.. After that, I told them to drive it hard and go WOT.. And the look on their faces, priceless ?? So to answer your question, power delivery at low end and normal driving is as mad as ever, but when you put your foot down, it becomes a ballistic missile. It is like stock with a shit load more power after 3k rpm. Another thing is that I've put around 10,000 hard Kms on the turbos and they are really steady and reliable. No issues at all. Really Kudos to Pure Turbos for such a wonderful product... I wished more people come out to contribute their experiences w different turbos (hybrid or single) and set-ups.. There's so much discussion on the N54 engine but not much with the 1M owners unfortunately |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-11-2016, 11:06 AM | #51 |
Lieutenant
189
Rep 585
Posts |
Very nice, thats good to hear its stock level drivability under 3k revs, and then monster over that
I've got stg2 TD turbos on mine, and just fitted the meth kit. Still in the process of finalizing the tune. Did you go for a twin meth setup? or just one cm7 nozzle?
__________________
If its broke.. Mod it! if not, mod it anyway!
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-11-2016, 12:31 PM | #52 | |
First Lieutenant
70
Rep 359
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-12-2016, 12:53 AM | #53 |
Captain
196
Rep 657
Posts |
Any idea how much it's making now? If you get the chance to dyno it that would be super helpful. You are right, not many are modifying the 1M much. I'd love to do turbos and cooler to go with the exhaust.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2016, 05:24 PM | #54 |
New Member
1
Rep 8
Posts |
How is this gain compared to replacing the mids with N55, Maddads or similar? More or less? Can't afford both mods... Already having cat-back exhaust.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2016, 11:21 AM | #56 |
Lieutenant Colonel
248
Rep 1,585
Posts
Drives: 2011 VO 1M
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Jupiter, FL
iTrader: (28)
Garage List 2010 Porsche 911 GT3 [10.00]
2021 BMW X5 SD40i [0.00] 2023 Toyota TRD Pro [0.00] 2011 BMW 1M [9.83] 2014 Ford Raptor [0.00] 2005 Ariel Atom 2 [0.00] 2008 135i SOLD [10.00] |
^must retune after cats are removed, my tuner has seen HP gains w/ cat removal.
__________________
///1M #643 of #740
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2016, 10:46 PM | #57 |
First Lieutenant
70
Rep 359
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2016, 10:57 PM | #58 | |
Banned
390
Rep 2,186
Posts |
Quote:
Mine made 413rwk on n55 mids on my tuned 1m Then we fitted the n54 mids and there was no power loss Don't listen to the hype the only thing you gain is noise and smell |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2016, 11:42 AM | #59 | ||
First Lieutenant
70
Rep 359
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2016, 01:46 AM | #61 |
Banned
390
Rep 2,186
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2016, 02:08 AM | #62 |
First Lieutenant
70
Rep 359
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-04-2016, 08:30 PM | #64 | |
Colonel
2625
Rep 2,819
Posts
Drives: e82 1M, f87 M2cs
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tri-Cities, Washington
|
Quote:
I am making 382 rwhp on a tractive brake dyno (corrected to about 431 rwhp dynojet, probably 450-460 crank HP) on stock turbos with K+N panel filter, intercooler and MadDad's as the only relevant engine mods. I don't think the midpipes hurt power.
__________________
1M track toy mods: BMS chargepipe, BMS OCC, ADE FMIC, ADE motor mounts, MadDad/Lightweight Ti exhaust, ADE custom oil thermostat/cooler, custom MHD tune, F10 550i clutch, Ohlins R+T, Vorschlag camber plates, M3 'vert FSB with Turner endlinks, Stoptech Trophy BBK.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2016, 01:41 AM | #65 |
Major
169
Rep 1,478
Posts
Drives: 2017 F80 M3
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
|
In regards to mids, they provide slight gains in peak HP, but most of the gains are in the mid RPM range.
__________________
_______________________
1991 E30 M3/Brilliantrot 2017 F80 M3/AW |
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2016, 03:18 AM | #66 | |
Banned
390
Rep 2,186
Posts |
Quote:
Actually the n54 mids made 1 rwk more but that's run variance |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|